Search published articles


Showing 3 results for Construction.

R. Ghousi, M. Khanzadi, K. Mohammadi Atashgah,
Volume 8, Issue 3 (10-2018)
Abstract

Construction industry has the highest ratio of fatality of workers in comparison with other industries. Construction safety has been always a matter of focus to control safety risks. This article presents a new flexible method of safety risk assessment by adding Hybrid Value Number (HVN) to the assessment equation. As a result of using this method, the results of assessment process will be more consistent with the project’s conditions, as well as being more trustful. It could provide a better perspective of safety risks for project managers. The most significant outcomes of this research are as follows: 1) the most influential factors which affect safety risks in building construction projects are "the proficiency and the experience of workers", "the complexity of construction technology" and "time limitation", 2) the biggest risk priority numbers belong to "Struck by falling objects" and "Falling to lower levels" hazards, 3)a necessary safety program must contain Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), safety measures and safety training, 4)Project managers can decrease 75% of total safety risks by investing less than 1.5% of construction budget on safety programs.
H. Dehghani, M. Amiri Moghadam, S. H. Mahdavi,
Volume 11, Issue 3 (8-2021)
Abstract

Selecting an appropriate flooring system is essential for structures. Flooring system design has traditionally focused on weight loss and minimizing costs. However, in recent years, the focus of this sector has changed to include improving the environmental performance of building materials and construction systems. This paper illustrates a knowledge-based expert system as a tool to assess of flooring systems such as block joisted (BJ), steel-concrete composite (SCC), composite steel deck (CSD) and concrete slab (CS) based on sustainability criteria that are further divided into twenty sub-criteria. Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is utilized as a multi-criteria decision making technique that helps to compute weights and rankings of sustainability criteria. For this purpose, some questionnaires completed by construction industry experts in order to compare criterions and sub-criteria in addition to assessment of optimized flooring systems. Then, results of the questionnaires are ranked by AHP and the most significant alternative is selected. The AHP results indicate that CSD system 47.9%, CS; 29.8%, SCC; 12.7% and BJ system 9.6% are the most and the least efficient systems, respectively.
O. Tavakoli, D. Sedaghat Shayegan, A. Amirkardoust,
Volume 14, Issue 4 (10-2024)
Abstract

Tower cranes are essential for both vertical and horizontal movement of materials in construction and port operations. Optimizing their placement is crucial for reducing costs and enhancing overall efficiency. This study addresses the optimization of tower crane placement using the recently developed Mouth Brooding Fish (MBF) algorithm. The MBF algorithm is inspired by the life cycle of mouth-brooding fish, employing their behavioral patterns and the survival challenges of their offspring to find optimal solutions. The performance of the MBF algorithm is compared with the Genetic Algorithm (GA), Colliding Bodies Optimization (CBO), and Enhanced Colliding Bodies Optimization (ECBO). The results demonstrate that the MBF algorithm is effective and has potential advantages in tackling complex optimization problems.

Page 1 from 1     

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iran University of Science & Technology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb